Thursday, June 7, 2012

Most school districts reject 'pink slime' for lunch programs

NEW YORK�The nation's school districts are turning up their noses at "pink slime," the beef product that leaped into the news earlier this year.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture says the vast majority of states participating in its National School Lunch Program have opted to order ground beef that doesn't contain the product, known in the industry as lean finely textured beef.

Only three states � Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota� chose to order ground beef that may contain the product.

The product has been used for decades, and federal regulators say it's safe to eat. It nevertheless became the center of national attention after the nickname "pink slime" was quoted in a New York Times article on the safety of meat processing. The filler is made of fatty bits of beef that are heated to remove much of the fat, then treated with a puff of ammonia to kill bacteria.

In response to the public outcry over its use, the USDA said in March said that it would for the first time offer schools the choice to purchase beef without the filler for the 2012-2013 school year. The department has continued to affirm that lean finely textured beef is a safe, affordable and nutritious product that reduces overall fat content.

But as of May 18, the agency says states ordered more than 20 million pounds of ground beef products that don't contain lean finely textured beef. Orders for beef that may contain the filler came to about 1 million pounds.

Because schools were not given a choice last year, all states may have previously received beef with the product.

The agency is still accepting orders for the upcoming school year.

Beef Products, the South Dakota company that makes LFTB, has announced that it will shut three of its four plants as a result of a drop in orders from fast-food chains, supermarkets and schools. It has set up a website, beefisbeef.com, to combat what it says are myths about the product.

"Based upon the misrepresentations that have been pervasive in the media to this point, it comes as no surprise that the majority of states have currently elected to purchase ground beef that does not contain lean finely textured beef," said Craig Letch, the company's director of food safety and quality.

The USDA does not buy lean finely textured beef directly, but buys products from beef vendors who must meet the agency's specifications; ground beef can include no more than 15% of the product.

The USDA's National School Lunch Program buys about 20% of the products served in schools across the country; the rest is bought by schools or school districts directly through private vendors.

The percentage of beef that schools get through the USDA tends to be higher, however, because beef is expensive and schools like to take advantage of favorable prices the government can negotiate.

.

1 comment:

  1. In the interest of full disclosure, I will start off buy stating I work in beef production and have first hand knowledge of how "pink slime" or Lean Finely Textured Beef, as it correctly known, is produced.

    While I fully support the rights of all, whether it be grocers, restaurants, or schools, to choose what forms of ground beef they offer, I cannot help but believe these choices may be being made based on inaccurate information portrayed in the media. The beef trimmings used to make LFTB must meet the same USDA inspection standards as those used to make ground beef. The only difference between the trimmings used to make ground beef, as we the consumer recognizes it, and the trimmings used to make LFTB is the lean beef to fat ratio. LFTB starts by using higher fat trimmings containing no bones, no tendons, and no organs. To achieve the higher lean ground beef that we all desire economically, the lean is separated from the fat and the lean is added back into the ground beef. The process of separating lean from fat is accomplished with centrifugal force similar to separating cream from milk.

    There have been countless food safety and food science experts come forward in support of this product. I have yet to see a single expert come forward to say this product is anything but safe and nutritious.

    Given my field of work, my beliefs may be construed as bias, but they are just that, my beliefs and do not reflect the official standings of any others.

    ReplyDelete